Alternative Publishing Platforms

So many new platforms emerge, we'll explore what they do and how they can help.

1 January 2022 - 2 July 2023,  00:00 - 00:00, 

image-for-app-homepage

Alternative Publishing Platforms

Image credit: Satellite picture E. by Böker under a CC BY 4.0 license

Alternative Publishing Platforms

Are you confused by all the 'alternative' scholarly publishing platforms that have emerged over recent years? Today there seem to be so many ways to communicate or disseminate research. There are not only peer-reviewed academic articles, monographs, conference proceedings, or theses. Now there are also preprint repositories, data journals, specialist data and code repositories, trials registries, scholarly blogs and websites, many forms of peer review and micropublications. These different forms of publication all have different aims, such as seeking to remove the barriers, constraints and costs imposed by legacy academic publishing companies, to reduce questionable practices, or make research work more deeply accessible and reusable.

In order to help guide conversations about the merits and downsides of these different 'alternative' publishing platforms, a new Task and Finish Group worked on a recently published Knowledge Exchange  (KE) scoping paper. As a next step, we hope that we can develop a taxonomy of these various platforms - platforms that follow different paths (e.g. in equitable publishing models, quality control, technical features, open source, iterative publishing workflows, etc.) compared to the legacy publishers. Such platforms represent a move away from the traditional journal as an organising principle and might differ from traditional scholarly journals in a number of ways, including publication process, governance, and underlying infrastructure. They can be regarded as examples of real innovative, open access scholarly communication or as effective "threat infrastructures" to traditional journal publishers. Knowing the directions in which these platforms are driving innovation, and their different aims, might allow us insight into what can be a confusing landscape.

Throughout the process we would welcome feedback on our scoping paper (https://doi.org/10.21428/996e2e37.3ebdc864) and the developing taxonomy. We therefore invite all stakeholders, including researchers, institutions, funders and (non profit) publishers to comment and provide feedback.

A French version of the scoping paper is available here

A full list of all participants of the Task & Finish group who are contributing to this activity is available at the end of this page.

We are exploring new publishing platforms to find out what they do and how they can help. Our Alternative Publishing Platforms scoping paper is available to read here and we would welcome comments and feedback from all stakeholders including researchers, institutions, funders and (non profit) publishers on this.

Key findings / outcome report download

Alternative Publishing Platforms
Open Access
20 April 2022

Alternative Publishing Platforms

Purpose: Scoping Document

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/996e2e37.3ebdc864

File type: PDF

Download


Participants